It seems there are four fatal flaws:
- The characteristic JSD "droop" does not occur at high speed. It is not a design characteristic, just a low speed characteristic. At higher speed (6 -7 knots) a JSD runs along the surface.
- Cones are inefficient shapes. The Seabrake or Shark are about 50% more form efficient.
- Cones are more unstable near the surface.
- Small drogues are less stable near the surface.
- The cones are too close together.
The result of these factors is that a good drogue design (Galerider, Seabrake, Fiorentino Shark) is more stable and far easier to use than a series drogue for emergency steering and speed reduction.
A real survival storm? I still think that drogues in tandem, well-spaced, have a lot of merits, right up there with the JSD. For more discussion and data, read either "Faster Cruising for the Coastal Sailor" or an up-coming Practical Sailor article (though it will surely by hacked to size). A tandem drogue is easier to manage than a JSD, gives more options, provides the same drag (braking power), and runs just as deep.
[Note. The secondary rode is NOT attached to the primary drogue, it is attached to the primary rode. It passes through the center. The drogues can be of other types--the illustration simply shows the pair I use. The Fiorentino Small Shark is excellent. The Delta Drogue is also good, although it is a bit less stable when near the surface.]
No comments:
Post a Comment